“If you knew Dr. Schmitt for less than 90 seconds, you might be excused for thinking that the court documents portray something similar to reality. But I have known him for eight years. If some government agency doesn’t like him—the sort of government agency that publishes broken websites, subsidizes fraudulent daycares, and can’t bother to keep lead out of the drinking water—it’s not him, it’s the agency. He’s talented, energetic, and generous, and tries very hard to be fully present and engaged in all of his conversations. Unfortunately, government bureaucrats call that sort of thing threatening behavior these days. We need to fix that agency and get this man justice.”

Gerard Keiser, High School Teacher, Student of Linguistics

I first met David Schmitt approximately twenty years ago at the Church of the Nativity in Menlo Park, CA. Dave has a PhD in biology, and I have a PhD in electrical engineering so we each had an appreciation for the importance of science and technology. In addition, we shared interests in politics, faith and the state of our society, and as a result, we spent many evenings discussing these and other topics over coffee.

After several years, Dave got the opportunity to move to Stockholm, to do research at the Karolinska Institute. He was there for several years and we stayed in touch. At one point, I spent a week visiting Dave in Stockholm and got to meet a number of his fellow scientists as well as his friends from church. He was always very enthusiastic about the work that he was doing and he seemed to have an insatiable thirst for knowledge. That and his considerable intelligence make him a talented and accomplished researcher.

Dave and I have remained in close communication over the years, including visits between Oklahoma and California, and I have always been impressed with his honesty, diligence and his intellectual curiosity. During the years in which he has worked in the water quality area, we have kept in close contact, both by telephone and email. His scientific approach to his work enabled him to impact the department in meaningful ways, both through his innovation in developing/improving procedures as well as in working to ensure that strict protocols regarding water safety were followed.

Dave is a strong and resourceful man who can always be counted on to keep his word and to strive to do his best at whatever task he undertakes. I admire him and support his efforts to assure that the people of Oklahoma have safe drinking water.

Michael Wilmer, Electronic Engineer, Former Software Executive

“with no regard for his own personal safety.”

My family and I have known Dr. David Schmitt (“Dave”) for about fifteen (15) years, having met him at a local church in Norman, Oklahoma while he was serving as a university research fellow. In all the time I have known him, he has never failed to act with integrity, honesty, thoughtfulness and regard for others. Dave is one of the most intelligent people I have ever met. He is not a superficial person and can be disarmingly methodical, deliberate, analytical and philosophical. He has a great and wry sense of humor and he is very well read. He is (likely) different than you and me in a lot of superficial and perhaps some substantive ways. In a society that values getting ahead and prefers fashion over substance, personality over character, and rewards looking out for number one, it can be easy for some to disregard, overlook or marginalize Dave. That is a shame.

The truth is we could use more people who regard the well-being of others and are willing to work and direct their energies to the improvement of society and its individuals. He was a tireless public servant who took his service to the citizens of Oklahoma seriously enough to perform his job with diligence and excellence. Unfortunately, and predictably, when ineffective and potentially dangerous bureaucracies are threatened, they tend to lash out at those who are pointing out their dangerous practices and they lash out most against who have worked hard and cultivated the character over a life time to continue to press on and to do their job with excellence and without regard to their own self-interest. After all, the quitters would have been beaten a long time ago. Most of us probably would have quit already. Most all of us would have withered under the personal, financial, physical and emotional pressure that has been brought to bear against Dave in his service to the people of Oklahoma at the Department of Environmental Quality. That is tragic.

I could go on and on about Dave’s intellectual gifts and sense of humor and service to others but really it is his strength of character and regard for others even at the expense of his own well-being that ought to be admired and emulated and supported by all of us. State government bureaucrats and pro-government merit counsels are not the final judge of a man in the end, and apparently not an accurate judge of a man in the meantime. When a man has the courage to say, “this is wrong” and stands up to be counted and does not back down under pressure to sell out and compromise his integrity, we used to call that heroism – instead, today, such a man can end up with his career ruined and fighting to survive against a system that will not abide non-conformity and challenging the status quo. While the government bureaucracy may regard itself as supreme even over and against the people it serves, I wonder how many of you and I would, in a private moment, when there is no fanfare and only the threat of real loss and harm, act in such a way that someone in the business of knowing what it means to act heroically and selflessly, would say you acted “with no regard for his own personal safety.” Whatever a man or woman claims to be and seems to be, strength of character is who we are when no one is watching. That is Dave.

Consider this account of Dr. Schmitt: https://newsok.com/article/3169870/five-honored-for-bravery

Steven Goodspeed
University of Oklahoma JD/MBA

Steven Goodspeed, Attorney

I have known Dave for almost 50 yrs now. Even though we have been separated by miles we have maintained a strong bond. Dave has been a loyal and true friend and confidant. The Dave Schmitt described by those at the DEQ at the trial was not the Dave I know. Though I was not in Oklahoma to witness I can attest to the character of the man and the portrayal presented was not the man I know. The man I know is a passionate and dedicated man who though not always given the easiest of paths in life has always maintained a keen sense of humor and the drive to complete whatever task was presented. My wife and I thought enough of Dave to ask him to be the Godfather at our daughters Baptism a task Dave happily took on. When I read of Dave being “intimidating” or being a “bully” I honestly laughed out loud. If you would accuse Dave of being sarcastic I would agree he is wonderfully sarcastic it is that sarcastic wit that has helped maintain our friendship. Dave can be passionate in his beliefs and never walked away from an argument but has never been a threatening person. When I read these types of falsehoods it makes me wonder what the real problem is, why create a false narrative? In closing I ask all who read to know that David Schmitt is one of the most decent men I know and if you can support him in anyway please do so for his plight could some day be yours!
Jim Zahren

Testimonial of James Zahren, Foreman, Steamfitter